Time were slow in the past, an old man can only catch one fish in his entire life. That fish was everything to him. His friend, his brother, his enemy, his meaning to life. The wounds he endured, the cold he suffered, the lonely nights without food, all is worth when he killed the fish. The old man can proudly claim that his is a fisherman now.
影评评论
每学习一点点，都是一次成长～曾丢弃了它，现在又要捡起。
“所谓外界的眼光，只是你内心的投射。” 心理暗示的力量真的是无穷大∞
很不错。我才发现自己平时不太注意的一些小细节能使人气质变好。这部剧还有插画更能理解。
希望这差距可以渐渐再缩小起来吧。希望不要太久。
Time were slow in the past, an old man can only catch one fish in his entire life. That fish was everything to him. His friend, his brother, his enemy, his meaning to life. The wounds he endured, the cold he suffered, the lonely nights without food, all is worth when he killed the fish. The old man can proudly claim that his is a fisherman now.
学术性与通俗性的完美结合，这部剧看了好多遍了，纯为消磨时间，大部分次数我都避开张献忠那一节，直到看了三遍《小海》，我才有用勇气去面对这段历史。编剧达到了“一切历史都是当代史”的高度，我们在这些故事里看到自己的命运，看到这个民族的命运，而且得以理解现在所发生的种种，会知道这样的宿命还远未终结——我以为编剧在这方面已经非常成功了，以此标准来看，《小海》才是他的巅峰之作。不少毛粉对他爱拿太祖和老朱比较颇有微词。至于那些拿“编剧的立场”来说事的，您这是想搞文字狱么，WG是不会再来了——吗？我国的语文教育，似乎在观看能力的培养方面颇为失败，正常的看懂、理解都做不到，却能解读出编剧的“别有深意”，这种技能真是牛逼，再加强一下，就能达到前辈们的高度，从“黄金叶”的烟盒上找出好几条反动标语了呢。 有一点还是想说一下，之前看熊逸讲老子的那部剧，不少类似观看障碍的“读者”，纷纷抨击编剧使用西哲的观念对比老子，是“崇洋媚外”，这真是无独有偶，本剧的编剧不可避免也遭到了这种指控。对此我只想说一句，社会科学的很多门类都是发源于欧美，就连“社会科学”这个词也是舶来，以现代的视角来研究明史，如何能回避引用国外的文献和观点？或许，没有规范的社会科学以及与此相匹配的大众意识，正是我们仍未跳出兴亡周期的原因吧。